- Email Notification from Subprocess.
- Problema resuelto, cuando se tiene un subproceso que tiene notificacion en la ultima tarea y este debe retornar al proceso
principal, entonces la notificacion se enviara al usuario del proceso principal.
- Email Notification from Subprocess.
- Problema resuelto, cuando se tiene un subproceso que tiene notificacion en la ultima tarea y este debe retornar al proceso
principal, entonces la notificacion se enviara al usuario del proceso principal.
- La funcion "LoadCase" de la clase "Cases" se usaba N veces y provocaba la lentitud
- Se optimizo el query para que no sea necesario usar la funcion "LoadCase" varias veces
- User appear more than once in the Process Supervisor window
- Problema resuelto, cuando se elimina a un usuario por ADMIN>USERS>Users, este usuario puede se eliminado sin restricciones
aunque el usuario este asignado como supervisor de un proceso lo cual no es correcto.
Se hace una validacion que verifica si el usuario esta asignado como supervisor le saldra un mensaje de confirmacion
que indica si deseea eliminar el usuario de todas maneras. Si la respuesta es Si, se eliminara de la lista de usuarios
y de la lista de usuarios asignados como supervisores.
- En el listado de trigger wizards no estaba ordenado, ahora se despliega ordenadamente
- Se corrigio el .feature correspondiente para que aplique el cambio
- Otros fixes tambien se realizaron
The search option in PMTables has a validation where the APP_UID field is ignored in the search because this was causing some search troubles when you wanna search a number that was include into the APP_UID (eg. 'APP_UID':405044408538cb9472ade260172, 'text to search':4408 )
Now, we add a checkbox field near the search text field to customize this behavior. With this checkbox 'Search also in the APP_UID field' you can decide if the search will include or not the APP_UID field.
The search option in PMTables has a validation where the APP_UID field is ignored in the search because this was causing some search troubles when you wanna search a number that was include into the APP_UID (eg. 'APP_UID':405044408538cb9472ade260172, 'text to search':4408 )
Now, we add a checkbox field near the search text field to customize this behavior. With this checkbox 'Search also in the APP_UID field' you can decide if the search will include or not the APP_UID field.
When an already created process is imported with the 'Create a completely new process..' option, the inputs asociated in the dynaforms are not the input created for this new process, this new (copy) process still has associated the input of the original process (same UID), this because the uid of the new input is never replaced in the new process's dynaform xml file.
So it was created a new field in the data object (the data that has all the information about the new process) where is all the old inputs uid and the new ones. Then using this object this old uids are replaced with the new inputs uids.
When an already created process is imported with the 'Create a completely new process..' option, the inputs asociated in the dynaforms are not the input created for this new process, this new (copy) process still has associated the input of the original process (same UID), this because the uid of the new input is never replaced in the new process's dynaform xml file.
So it was created a new field in the data object (the data that has all the information about the new process) where is all the old inputs uid and the new ones. Then using this object this old uids are replaced with the new inputs uids.
- When creating a dynaform with the character "&", the field handlers not working.
- Problema resuelto, el problema que se teníera lo siguiente cuando se utiliza el "&" en el tílo de un dynaform,
cuando se enviaba los datos via GET, el "&" lo interpretaba como un separador de variables y esto ocasionaba la
division de los datos que se enviaba. Se valida los datos enviados via GET codificáolos y al recibir estos datos
se los decodifica.
